Fusortron?

Yours and mine. This is where you can gas on about how you think the universe works. To a point, after that we'll expect you to actually test your stuff and report.

Re: Fusortron?

Postby Joe Jarski » Tue Nov 09, 2010 11:31 pm

Doug, good point about slow ions. I just had it set in my mind that the ions in the storage ring would be of the fast variety and the field required to bend them that amount would be enormous.
User avatar
Joe Jarski
 
Posts: 231
Joined: Thu Sep 16, 2010 9:37 pm
Location: SouthEast Michigan

Re: Fusortron?

Postby chrismb » Wed Nov 10, 2010 3:20 am

Joe Jarski wrote:I'm still trying to make sense of the patent. There are several things that either I don't understand yet, or it just doesn't look like it would work - unless there are some important details left out, but a few problems that I see are...
1. Pulling the ions out of the storage ring to the center
2. Getting the ions to go to the center where they would collide
3. Getting them back into the storage ring without hitting the chamber walls
I'm very much a beginner at this stuff, but is it even possible for the ring magnet to cause enough of a bend to send the ions to the center?

I'll have to get a sketch posted of what I had in mind.


So let's imagine you are a 50 keV deuteron travelling around a storage ring which is 1m radius. Your speed is around 2 Mm/s so that means the radial force to provide the centripetal acceleration towards the centre is 1.6E-14 N. Now imagine that 1.6E-14 N is made up of 4.8E-15 N from a B field of 750 Gauss, and -3.2E-15 N [that is, it is outwards-directed] made up of electric field with a field gradient of 20,000 V/m (200 V/cm).

(You can see that all these figures are very reasonable. This is the way it is; a device of around 1 m in size is very amenable to this field arrangement as it is not at all arduous for ions at fusion energies.)

Anyhows, now imagine that this electric field is turned off while you are in the beam. All of a sudden, you are now looking at a 4.8E-15 N force towards the centre, so your radius of gyration drops by a third which causes you to turn towards the centre of the device. The magnetic field is arranged so that as it curves around, at the moment it is heading towards the centre, the mag field has eased off and it now heads towards the centre in a straight line. If it misses, then it will simply recover back into the storage ring, by the reverse process.

This number-crunching is exactly the same for my device; I have an outwardly directed e-field and with the orbit/B-field configured so there is a magnetic force inwards. When these two quantities balance with the centripetal force, so the orbit is stable. The orbit is therefore governed by Bqwr=mrw^2+Eq (w=omega=rotational velocity).
chrismb
 
Posts: 620
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2010 7:32 pm

Re: Fusortron?

Postby chrismb » Wed Nov 10, 2010 3:25 am

Joe Jarski wrote:After scattering there'd be a random mess that would eventually cross the gap and accelerate again.
Yeah. Dead right - a random mess. Random messes are called 'thermalisation'!

So Doug is right that the electrostatic behaviour in the centre will send everything everywhere, but I suspect if you confronted the inventor he'd just say that that doesn't matter because they still end up heading back into the storage ring for another go.

...Wrong!.... I have noticed many a good piece of science let down by the 2 dimensional visualizations of the author. Unfortunately, things won't just scatter radially as in the picture, they will scatter up and down as well, away from the plane. These will just get well-lost - just as they do in a cyclotron when ions meet background. They scatter isotropically in 3 D, not just in 2 D!
chrismb
 
Posts: 620
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2010 7:32 pm

Previous

Return to Theories and speculations

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest